United States Senate election in Michigan, 2014
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
County results
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Michigan | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 2014 United States Senate election in Michigan was held on November 4, 2014, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Michigan, concurrently with the election of the Governor of Michigan, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.
Incumbent Democratic Senator Carl Levin decided to retire instead of running for re-election to a seventh term. Primary contests took place on August 5, 2014, with U.S. Representative Gary Peters and former Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land unopposed on the Democratic and Republican primary ballots, respectively.[1] Peters defeated Land in the general election.
Contents
Democratic primary
Candidates
Declared
- Gary Peters, U.S. Representative[2]
Failed to qualify
Declined
- Shane Battier, NBA basketball player[5]
- Jocelyn Benson, Dean of Wayne State University Law School and nominee for Michigan Secretary of State in 2010[6][7]
- Virgil Bernero, Mayor of Lansing and nominee for Governor in 2010[8]
- Mark Bernstein, attorney and Regent of the University of Michigan[9]
- James Blanchard, former Governor of Michigan[10]
- Deborah Dingell, Chairman of the Wayne State University Board of Governors and wife of U.S. Representative John Dingell (running for MI-12)[11]
- Jennifer Granholm, former Governor of Michigan[12]
- Dan Kildee, U.S. Representative[13]
- Carl Levin, incumbent U.S. Senator[14][15]
- Sander Levin, U.S. Representative and Carl Levin's brother[16]
- Gretchen Whitmer, Minority Leader of the Michigan Senate[17]
Endorsements
Gary Peters |
---|
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
Politicians
Organizations
|
Polling
Hypothetical polling |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Results
Democratic primary results[29] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
Democratic | Gary Peters | 504,102 | 100 | |
Total votes | 504,102 | 100 |
Republican primary
After Terri Lynn Land declared her candidacy in June 2013, Republicans attempted to recruit U.S. Representative Dave Camp and Oakland County District Court Judge Kimberly Small to run instead.[30] Camp, after earlier having said that he was not interested in running, reconsidered it, and Land indicated that she would consider dropping out if Camp decided to run.[31] Republicans were initially reluctant to rally around Land,[32][33] but after Camp and Small declined to run, other Republicans like U.S. Representative Justin Amash and Holland Mayor Kurt Dykstra also said no, and a late attempt to convince cardiologist Rob Steele to run failed, Land emerged as the de facto nominee.[33]
Candidates
Declared
- Terri Lynn Land, former member of the Republican National Committee and former Michigan Secretary of State[34]
Withdrew
- Matthew Wiedenhoeft, businessman and former minor league hockey player and coach (running for the State House)[3][35]
Declined
- Justin Amash, U.S. Representative[36]
- Saul Anuzis, former Chairman of the Michigan Republican Party[37]
- David Brandon, University of Michigan Athletic Director[38]
- Brian Calley, Lieutenant Governor of Michigan[39]
- Dave Camp, U.S. Representative[40]
- Mike Cox, former Michigan Attorney General[10]
- Betsy DeVos, former Chairman of the Michigan Republican Party[41]
- Dick DeVos, businessman and nominee for Governor in 2006[41]
- Clark Durant, Charter School Advocate and candidate for the U.S. Senate in 1990 and 2012[10]
- Kurt Dykstra, Mayor of Holland[42]
- John Engler, former Governor of Michigan[43]
- Pete Hoekstra, former U.S. Representative and 2012 Senate nominee[44]
- Ruth Johnson, Michigan Secretary of State[45]
- Roger Kahn, State Senator[46]
- Pete Lund, Majority Whip of the Michigan House of Representatives[45]
- Candice Miller, U.S. Representative[10][47]
- Jim Murray, President of AT&T Michigan[48]
- Andrea Fischer Newman, Regent of the University of Michigan[49]
- John Rakolta, businessman[50]
- Randy Richardville, Majority Leader of the Michigan Senate[48][51]
- Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative[52]
- G. Scott Romney, former member of the Michigan State University Board of Trustees, candidate for Attorney General of Michigan in 1998 and member of the Romney family[53]
- Ronna Romney McDaniel, Republican National Committeewoman and member of the Romney family[54]
- Bill Schuette, Michigan Attorney General[6][10]
- Kimberly Small, Judge on Michigan's 48th District Court[55]
- Rob Steele, cardiologist[56]
Endorsements
Terri Lynn Land |
---|
|
Polling
Hypothetical polling |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Results
Republican primary results[29] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
Republican | Terri Lynn Land | 588,084 | 100 | |
Total votes | 588,084 | 100 |
Minor parties
Libertarian Party
U.S. Taxpayers Party
- Richard A. Matkin[66]
Green Party
Independents
Candidates
Declared
- Jeff Jones, retired financial services industry worker and pastor[68]
- Paul Marineau, attorney and former Mayor pro tem of Douglas[69]
General election
Campaign
Early on, the open seat was considered to be competitive. But various missteps by the Land campaign[70] as well as Land's reluctance to appear in public after suffering a meltdown in front of the media in May[71][72] weighed down the Land campaign, allowing Peters to open up a consistent lead in the polls beginning in September. The Republican establishment effectively gave up on Land's campaign the following month.[73][74]
Debates
Peters agreed to four debates; Land did not responded to invitations.[75] Negotiations between the Land and Peters campaigns broke down over the format of proposed debates between the two candidates.[76]
Polling
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Terri Lynn Land (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | November 2, 2014 | 1,224 | ± 2.8% | 52% | 40% | 4%[77] | 4% |
Public Policy Polling | November 1–2, 2014 | 914 | ± 3.2% | 51% | 38% | 4%[77] | 6% |
54% | 41% | — | 5% | ||||
EPIC-MRA | October 26–28, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 50% | 35% | 5% | 10% |
Mitchell Research | October 27, 2014 | 1,159 | ± 2.88% | 52% | 38% | 5%[78] | 5% |
Glengariff Group | October 22–24, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 47.7% | 32.6% | 5.9% | 13.8% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov | October 16–23, 2014 | 2,394 | ± 3% | 49% | 41% | 1% | 10% |
Rasmussen Reports | October 20–22, 2014 | 1,000 | ± 3% | 51% | 42% | 3% | 4% |
Public Policy Polling | October 20–21, 2014 | 723 | ± ? | 53% | 39% | — | 8% |
Clarity Campaign Labs | October 19–20, 2014 | 1,032 | ± ? | 48% | 33% | — | 19% |
Mitchell Research | October 19, 2014 | 919 | ± 3.23% | 51.1% | 37.5% | 4.4%[79] | 7% |
EPIC-MRA | October 17–19, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 34% | 4% | 16% |
Clarity Campaign Labs | October 12–14, 2014 | 967 | ± 3.16% | 49% | 36% | — | 18% |
Lake Research Partners | October 11–13, 2014 | ? | ± ? | 49% | 37% | — | 14% |
Mitchell Research | October 12, 2014 | 1,340 | ± 2.68% | 50% | 39% | 3.5%[80] | 8% |
Mitchell Research | October 9, 2014 | 1,306 | ± 2.71% | 48% | 43% | 3.5%[81] | 6% |
Wenzel Strategies | October 6–7, 2014 | 615 | ± 3.93% | 46.9% | 44.3% | — | 8.8% |
Glengariff Group | October 2–4, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 44% | 35% | 6% | 15% |
Public Policy Polling | October 2–3, 2014 | 654 | ± 3.8% | 49% | 42% | — | 9% |
Marketing Resource Group | September 30–October 2, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 47.4% | 36.4% | — | 16.2% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov | September 20–October 1, 2014 | 2,560 | ± 2% | 46% | 41% | 2% | 11% |
Lake Research Partners | September 27–30, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 36% | — | 18% |
Mitchell Research | September 29, 2014 | 1,178 | ± 2.86% | 49% | 36% | 5%[82] | 9% |
EPIC-MRA | September 25–29, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 42% | 33% | 11% | 14% |
Target Insyght | September 22–24, 2014 | 616 | ± 4% | 48% | 38% | 6% | 7% |
Public Policy Polling | September 18–19, 2014 | 852 | ± 3.4% | 47% | 40% | — | 13% |
We Ask America | September 18–19, 2014 | 1,182 | ± 3% | 42% | 39% | 5%[82] | 14% |
Rasmussen Reports | September 17–18, 2014 | 750 | ± 4% | 41% | 39% | 5% | 15% |
Magellan Strategies | September 14–15, 2014 | 717 | ± 3.66% | 45% | 40% | 5%[83] | 5% |
Mitchell Research | September 14, 2014 | 829 | ± 3.4% | 43% | 41% | 8%[84] | 9% |
Denno Research | September 11–13, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 44.7% | 37.7% | — | 17.7% |
Suffolk | September 6–10, 2014 | 500 | ± 4.4% | 45.6% | 36.8% | 6.4%[85] | 11.2% |
Public Policy Polling | September 4–7, 2014 | 687 | ± 3.7% | 43% | 36% | 7%[86] | 13% |
45% | 40% | — | 15% | ||||
Glengariff Group | September 3–5, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 47% | 36.5% | 3.5% | 13% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov | August 18–September 2, 2014 | 2,897 | ± 3% | 42% | 43% | 2% | 13% |
Mitchell Research | August 27, 2014 | 1,004 | ± 3.09% | 46% | 44% | — | 10% |
EPIC-MRA | August 22–25, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 39% | — | 16% |
Lake Research Partners | August 6–11, 2014 | 800 | ± 3.5% | 42% | 38% | — | 19% |
Mitchell Research | August 5, 2014 | 626 | ± 5% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
Harper Polling | August 4–5, 2014 | 549 | ± 4.18% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
Marketing Resource Group | July 26–30, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 46.7% | 40% | — | 13.3% |
Rasmussen Reports | July 28–29, 2014 | 750 | ± 4% | 45% | 39% | 6% | 10% |
Benenson Strategy Group | July 26–29, 2014 | 900 | ± 3.2% | 47% | 42% | — | 11% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov | July 5–24, 2014 | 3,849 | ± 2.8% | 44% | 45% | 1% | 10% |
Mitchell Research | July 7–17, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 43% | 38% | — | 19% |
EPIC-MRA | July 12–15, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 36% | — | 19% |
Denno Research | July 9–11, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 39.5% | 37.3% | — | 23.2% |
NBC News/Marist | July 7–10, 2014 | 870 | ± 3.3% | 43% | 37% | 2% | 19% |
Public Policy Polling | June 26–29, 2014 | 578 | ± 4.1% | 41% | 36% | — | 24% |
Magellan Strategies | June 5 & 8, 2014 | 753 | ± 3.57% | 50% | 41% | 5% | 4% |
Mitchell Research | June 6, 2014 | 961 | ± 3.16% | 44.6% | 41.5% | — | 13.8% |
Glengariff Group | May 20–22, 2014 | 600 | ± 4.3% | 39.6% | 35.3% | — | 25% |
EPIC-MRA | May 17–20, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 44% | 38% | — | 18% |
Hickman Analytics | April 24–30, 2014 | 502 | ± 4.4% | 42% | 37% | — | 21% |
Magellan Strategies | April 14–15, 2014 | 875 | ± 3.31% | 46% | 41% | 8% | 5% |
Harper Polling | April 7–8, 2014 | 538 | ± 4.22% | 40% | 43% | — | 18% |
Mitchell Research | April 9, 2014 | 1,460 | ± 2.56% | 38% | 44% | — | 18% |
Public Policy Polling | April 3–6, 2014 | 825 | ± 3.4% | 41% | 36% | — | 23% |
Marketing Resource Group | March 24–28, 2014 | 600 | ± 4.1% | 38% | 40% | — | 22% |
Denno Research | March 9–10, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 39.7% | 36.7% | 2% | 21.7% |
Clarity Campaigns | February 22–23, 2014 | 859 | ± 2.55% | 46% | 40% | — | 14% |
EPIC-MRA | February 5–11, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 38% | 41% | — | 21% |
Harper Polling | January 19–20, 2014 | 750 | ± 3.58% | 37% | 42% | — | 21% |
Rasmussen Reports | January 14–15, 2014 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 35% | 37% | 8% | 20% |
Harper Polling | January 7–8, 2014 | 1,004 | ± 3.09% | 36% | 44% | — | 20% |
Public Policy Polling | December 5–8, 2013 | 1,034 | ± 3% | 40% | 42% | — | 18% |
Denno Research | November 12–14, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 37% | 36% | — | 27% |
Inside Michigan Politics | October 29, 2013 | 794 | ± 4% | 43% | 38% | — | 19% |
Public Policy Polling | October 14–15, 2013 | 642 | ± 3.9% | 43% | 36% | — | 21% |
MRG/Mitchell Research | October 6–10, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 39% | 40% | — | 21% |
EPIC-MRA | September 7–10, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 38% | 37% | — | 25% |
Mitchell Research | August 26, 2013 | 1,881 | ± 2.23% | 36% | 39% | — | 25% |
Denno Research | July 23–24, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 39% | 39% | — | 22% |
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 41% | 36% | — | 23% |
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 571 | ± 4.1% | 33% | 32% | — | 35% |
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 21.14% | 28.66% | — | 50.20% |
<templatestyles src="Template:Hidden begin/styles.css"/>
- With Dingell
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Deborah Dingell (D) |
Justin Amash (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 38% | 28% | — | 34% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Deborah Dingell (D) |
Teri Lynn Land (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 31% | 35% | — | 34% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Deborah Dingell (D) |
Mike Rogers (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 34% | 29% | — | 37% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Deborah Dingell (D) |
Ronna Romney McDaniel (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 36% | 29% | — | 35% |
- With Granholm
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Jennifer Granholm (D) |
Justin Amash (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 42.49% | 34.14% | — | 23.37% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Jennifer Granholm (D) |
Teri Lynn Land (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 42.99% | 39.84% | — | 17.17% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Jennifer Granholm (D) |
Mike Rogers (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 42.20% | 39.67% | — | 18.14% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Jennifer Granholm (D) |
G. Scott Romney (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 43.10% | 40.38% | — | 16.52% |
- With Levin
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Carl Levin (D) |
Justin Amash (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 49% | 34% | — | 18% |
Public Policy Polling | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 53% | 32% | — | 15% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Carl Levin (D) |
Roger Kahn (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 50% | 30% | — | 20% |
Public Policy Polling | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 53% | 31% | — | 17% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Carl Levin (D) |
Candice Miller (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 46% | 35% | — | 19% |
Public Policy Polling | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 52% | 34% | — | 14% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Carl Levin (D) |
Mike Rogers (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 49% | 33% | — | 18% |
Public Policy Polling | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 55% | 31% | — | 14% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Carl Levin (D) |
Bill Schuette (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 51% | 32% | — | 17% |
Public Policy Polling | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 54% | 32% | — | 15% |
- With LOLGOP
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
LOLGOP (D) | Justin Amash (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 23% | 22% | — | 55% |
- With Peters
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Justin Amash (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 42% | 30% | — | 29% |
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 39% | 29% | — | 32% |
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 22.56% | 19.07% | — | 57.37% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Saul Anuzis (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 44% | 24% | — | 32% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Dave Camp (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 43% | 31% | — | 26% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Kurt Dykstra (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | August 26, 2013 | 1,881 | ± 2.23% | 38% | 37% | — | 25% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Roger Kahn (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 44% | 26% | — | 30% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Mike Rogers (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 42% | 32% | — | 25% |
EPIC-MRA | May 11–15, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 37% | 30% | — | 33% |
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 36% | 31% | — | 33% |
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 20.39% | 22.75% | — | 56.86% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
G. Scott Romney (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harper Polling | March 9–10, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 26.15% | 28.57% | — | 45.28% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Ronna Romney McDaniel (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research | March 19 & 21, 2013 | 1,744 | ± 2.35% | 36% | 29% | — | 35% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Kimberly Small (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 42% | 26% | — | 32% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Gary Peters (D) |
Rob Steele (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 44% | 26% | — | 29% |
Results
The election was not close. Gary Peters, was declared the winner right when the polls closed in Michigan.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Gary Peters | 1,704,936 | 54.6 | -8.1 | |
Republican | Terri Lynn Land | 1,290,199 | 41.3 | +7.5 | |
Libertarian | Jim Fulner | 62,897 | 2.0% | +.4% | |
Green | Chris Wahmhoff | 26,137 | 0.9% | 0 | |
U.S. Taxpayers | Richard Matkin | 37,529 | 1.2% | +.6% | |
Write-Ins | 77 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
Majority | 414,737 | ||||
Turnout | 3,121,775 | ||||
Democratic hold | Swing |
See also
- Michigan gubernatorial election, 2014
- Michigan Attorney General election, 2014
- Michigan Secretary of State election, 2014
- United States Senate elections, 2014
- United States elections, 2014
- United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan, 2014
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/10/19/senate-michigan-endorsement-peters/17514459/
- ↑ http://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/10/29/news-endorsement-peters-senate/18138721/
- ↑ http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/10/24/editorial-vote-gary-peters-us-senate/17832049/
- ↑ http://www.mlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/10/mlive_media_group_gary_peters.html#incart_river
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://www.record-eagle.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-peters-clear-choice-for-senate/article_6dcf9ca1-ff28-5ad1-94ff-034f923becbb.html
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 33.0 33.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 41.0 41.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 48.0 48.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ GOProud's 2014 Endorsements
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 66.0 66.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20141109/NEWS/311099976/republicans-campaign-stumbles-helped-sink-land-amid-gop-wave
- ↑ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/29/michigan-lynn-land_n_5413352.html
- ↑ http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2014/10/tim_skubick_terri_lynn_lands_c.html
- ↑ http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/meet-gop-senate-candidate-republicans-love-hate/story?id=26224000
- ↑ http://atr.rollcall.com/senate-races-2014-why-michigan-never-became-iowa/
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://www.wxyz.com/news/political/negotiations-end-for-proposed-us-senate-debate-between-land-peters-on-wxyz-and-wood-tv
- ↑ 77.0 77.1 Jim Fullner (L) 2%, Richard Matkin (TP) 1%, Chris Wahmhoff (G) 1%
- ↑ Jim Fullner (L) 3%, Richard Matkin (TP) 1%, Chris Wahmhoff (G) 1%
- ↑ Jim Fullner (L) 2.2%, Richard Matkin (TP) 1%, Chris Wahmhoff (G) 1.2%
- ↑ Jim Fullner (L) 2%, Richard Matkin (TP) 0.5%, Chris Wahmhoff (G) 1%
- ↑ Jim Fullner (L) 1%, Richard Matkin (TP) 0.5%, Chris Wahmhoff (G) 2%
- ↑ 82.0 82.1 Jim Fulner (L) 3%, Richard Matkin (TP) 1%, Chris Wahmhof (G) 1%
- ↑ Jim Fulner (L) 5%, Richard Matkin (TP) 2%, Chris Wahmhof (G) 3%
- ↑ Jim Fulner (L) 3%, Richard Matkin (TP) 2%, Chris Wahmhof (G) 3%
- ↑ Jim Fulner (L) 3.2%, Richard Matkin (TP) 1.8%, Chris Wahmhof (G) 1.4%
- ↑ Jim Fulner (L) 4%, Richard Matkin (TP) 2%, Chris Wahmhof (G) 1%
- ↑ http://miboecfr.nictusa.com/election/results/14GEN/05000000.html
External links
- Official campaign websites